Maria Sakkari Makes Novak Djokovic Comparison to Address Constant Criticism

“Even Djokovic Gets Criticized”—Sakkari Stresses Acceptance

Maria Sakkari has opened up about the constant scrutiny athletes face, using Novak Djokovic as the prime example to highlight that criticism is simply inevitable—even for the greatest in the game.

Despite her reputation for professionalism and sportsmanship, Sakkari has remained one of the most criticized figures in women’s tennis.

“There are negative comments about Djokovic. Like, what else does this guy have to prove?” Sakkari told The Second Serve.
“It’s just the world we live in right now. So we have to accept it, and just keep going.”

A Career Marked by Critique Despite Achievements

Sakkari reached a career-high ranking of world No. 3 in 2022, but she has often found herself under the microscope, particularly for her performances in Grand Slam events. Early-round exits and a lack of deep Slam runs have fueled her doubters, many of whom question her long-standing presence in the Top 10.

“Even if I get back to the Top 5, they’re going to say, ‘Okay, yes, but she doesn’t have a Grand Slam,’” Sakkari explained.
“And even if you do win a Slam, they’ll say, ‘Yeah, but she hasn’t won on grass’ or something. If someone wants to say something, they’re always going to.”

Struggles in 2025 and Path to Recovery

So far in 2025, Sakkari holds a 7-12 win-loss record. This week, she competed in Charleston, where she lost in the second round to Zheng Qinwen. Entering the tournament ranked No. 64, Sakkari is now expected to fall out of the Top 80 in the WTA rankings.

It’s worth noting that she ended her 2024 season early after the US Open due to a shoulder injury and is still working her way back to peak form.

Sakkari’s message is clear: no matter your accolades, criticism is inevitable. If even Novak Djokovic, a 24-time Grand Slam champion, isn’t immune, neither is anyone else. Her perspective offers a reminder that resilience is just as crucial as talent in a sport that often thrives on scrutiny.